17.7.06

Human Life



This is one of the many disturbing images brought to you by the Israeli Defence Forces in their ferocious attacks on civilians in Lebanon and Palestine. The picture above is what happened to a family fleeing the southern Lebanese village of Tel Afra when they encountered the IDF.

My philosophy on the subject is very simple. Human life has value. Murder is murder regardless of the justification given for it. Wether it is committed by Hizballah, Hamas, Israel, America, Al Qaeda, The IRA, or Somali Warlords, murder is still murder.

And murder is wrong.
---------------------------

---------------------------

14.7.06

Politics in Israel, Iraq, and America

On the situations in Israel, Iraq, and other news.
------------------
In his book Politics, the philosopher Aristotle stated that "At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst." I can think of no more apt description of the current state of world affairs.

The past week has seen an increasing spiral of inhumanity that can be, at best, described as troubling to even the passing consumer of news. Recent events in and , along with continuing situations that revolve around the , are lending creedence to Aristotle's prolific words.

The most basic truism of elementary physics is that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. The surge of violent conflict in recent years is likely to continue to have repercussions for many years to come, and that is not going to turn out well for any of us. The separation of law and justice from actions taken on behalf of the voting- or non-voting- publics of major world powers has already started taking its toll on general safety and security, and the prospects for the situation improving anytime in the near future look quite grim.


In the news

Israel
I constantly mention how violence only brings more violence, and often point to the tenuous relationship between Israel and Palestine as an example. This kind of cycle of violence can only be put to an end when both sides stop with their attacks, but that is far from likely to happen anytime in the near future with the recent happenings in the Occupied Territories and Lebanon.

The past week has seen Israel pursue actions that all but ensure that the current violent Intifada will last for many years to come. Killing civilians at an alarming rate, and being tacitly encouraged to do so by the most powerful regime in the world, is going to bring about a surge in recruitment for organised groups that wish to take up arms against those responsible for these deplorable actions. In its bid to crush militant groups, Israel has committed acts that instigate additional attacks, and the cycle of violence is assured to continue. Seeing that Israel can act with impunity in their slaughter of civilians, many in the region will doubtlessly be driven to take it into their own hands to bring justice to (punish) those responsible.


Even those that support Israel have said of late that their response to the recent kidnappings has been "overkill". Their choice of targets is, to put it one way, a bit vindictive.

By way of example, pictured below you can see what Beirut International Airport normally looks like.



This is how it looked thursday.

In the middle of the tourist season for the beautiful tourist haven that is western Beirut, the IDF has bombed the international airport as part of their retaliation for the kidnapping of 2 Israeli soldiers by the militant group Hezbollah, which is based in southern Lebanon. It was part of a larger military operation that has seen all Israeli military reserve personnel called up, and has seen Israel mount a full scale invasion of Lebanon for the first time since 1982.

In the process, at least 55 civilians and countless "suspected militants" have been killed in Lebanon. The Guardian reports on the attacks:


Israeli air force planes ranged freely across Lebanon, bombing villages, army bases, bridges and a television station as the Jewish state intensified its campaign to win the release of two soldiers captured by Hizbullah on the border on Wednesday.

The air raids also severed the main road between Beirut and the Syrian capital, Damascus. Israeli gunboats turned ships away from Lebanese ports and last night flames were billowing from fuel tanks after a second attack on the capital's crippled airport. At least 50 Lebanese were killed in the assault, including 17 members of two families.


Deutsche Presse-Agentur reports that the dead included at least 10 children. It continues:


"Among the civilian Lebanese deaths were a Shiite Muslim sheikh, his wife and eight children who were killed when an Israeli missile struck an olive grove near their home in the southern village of Dweir, police said.

Another family of seven, including a 10-month-old baby, was killed in the village of Baflay near the coast.


Israel have also destroyed the main highway that leads into and out of the city of Beirut, and bombed the fuel stores of the city's power plant. Hezbollah has been making retaliatory rocket attacks against positions inside Israel, and the Lebanese army was reported firing anti-aircraft weapons at the attacking Israeli planes.

Similarly, in Gaza, Israel has destroyed every major bridge that leads into and out of the occupied territories. That, along with the fact that the UN reports that Gaza is likely to run out of fresh water supplies within 2 weeks, does not bode well for an area that is already a humanitarian danger zone.

The Prime Minister of Japan, Junichiro Koizumi, was in Jordan to meet with King Abdullah. During his visit, the AFP quotes that Abdullah told Koizumi "It may be exaggeration, but (the current situation) appears close to the one on the eve of the 1967 Middle East war," The prime minister of Japan also visited Palestinian President Abbas, and Japan has promised $30 million worth of aid to Palestine. According to the Mainichi Daily: "Abbas told reporters that he agreed with Koizumi on the need for continued efforts to end a critical situation in the Palestinian territories as soon as possible in order to establish peace in the region." Abbas also called upon "concerned international powers for an immediate intervention to halt the dangerous deterioration in the Middle East." according toWAFA news.

Right around the same time as that visit, the Israeli Air Force bombed the head offices of the Foreign Ministry of Palestine.

Ha'aretz reports that even Condeleeza Rice urged the Israeli government to "exercise restraint," but the response by Israeli Ambassador Daniel Ayalon was that "what we are doing is the most effective (way) to stop [Hezbollah]," and he also said "I think they (Hezbollah) misinterpreted our restraint for the last six years." The AFP reports: In an indication the offensive was far from over, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert authorised the army "to press on with its operation in Lebanon and hit more targets".


UN Secretary General Kofi Annan has dispatched a team of 3 "veteran negotiators" to the region to try and calm the situation. In response to Israel's invasion and subsequent "disproportionate use of force" in attacking civilian areas, France negotiated a UN Security Council resolution condemning Israel's actions, and also condemning militant attacks against Israel. The UN News Center reports:


Denmark, Peru, Slovakia and United Kingdom abstained from voting on the draft, which also called for the release of all Palestinian officials detained by Israel and called on the Palestinian Authority to take “immediate and sustained” action to bring and end the firing of rockets from Gaza into Israel.

The text would have explicitly condemned Israel’s current “military assault” in Gaza, which, it said, “has caused the killing and injury of dozens of Palestinian civilians” and destroyed Gaza’s main power station.

In addition, the draft called on the international community to provide emergency assistance to the Palestinian people to help alleviate the dire humanitarian situation, and on the Israeli Government to restore and maintain the continuous and uninterrupted supply of fuel to Gaza, and to “act expeditiously” to replace destroyed equipment at the power plant.


The resolution was vetoed by the U.S.

In doing so, they have shown to the international community, and to the victims of this violence against civilians, that they endorse and support such violence. As the U.S. government is meant to represent the people of America, it is to be assumed in the international community that Americans support murderous attacks on civilians. That is a shameful way for "the home of the brave" to be portraying themselves in the international community.


In only a few days, the israeli "seige" of Palestine and Lebanon has cost the lives of over one hundred civilians. That is alot of berieved and angry family members and friends. The fact that the international community is not stepping in to put an end to the violence is going to lead people to, feeling that justice is not being served, take up arms against those they feel are responsible. The assertion that murderous attacks against civilians are somehow going to put an end to terror attacks against israel is the most illogical conclusion one could possibly come up with. The reality is that these attacks are only going to increase the amplitude of this cycle of violence, and it is growing so rapidly at the moment that it threatens peace throughout the whole region.


Iraq
The past week has also seen spiraling violence in Iraq. Additional sectarian attacks yesterday claimed the lives of 14 innocent civilians.

While this has been discussed fairly openly in the western media, it has been marginalised in the Iraqi media, out of fear of contributing to a public fear of what seems to be emerging as a civil war. As such, not many Iraqi bloggers have discussed this latest wave of violence.

However, such attacks have become so commonplace of late, it is also possible that the only difference between this string of attacks and previous similar attacks in Iraq is that this is receiving more western press coverage.

Blogger Riverbend discusses the attacks on her most recent blog post, dated Tuesday, 11 July. The post begins:
Atrocities...

It promises to be a long summer. We're almost at the mid-way point, but it feels like the days are just crawling by. It's a combination of the heat, the flies, the hours upon hours of no electricity and the corpses which keep appearing everywhere.

The day before yesterday was catastrophic. The day began with news of the killings in Jihad Quarter. According to people who live there, black-clad militiamen drove in mid-morning and opened fire on people in the streets and even in houses. They began pulling people off the street and checking their ID cards to see if they had Sunni names or Shia names and then the Sunnis were driven away and killed. Some were executed right there in the area. The media is playing it down and claiming 37 dead but the people in the area say the number is nearer 60.

The horrific thing about the killings is that...

...Riverbend's Post Continues...

Yesterday there were more sectarian attacks, reported to have taken the lives of between 15 and 20 civilians.

Iraq has become, even with large numbers of military and "police" forces around, a lawless country. Without law and justice, man is the worst of all creatures.

and then some
Meanwhile, the U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad, reported to the U.S. Congress that:
"Americans should be strategically optimistic about Iraq, even as the continuing difficulties in Iraq will require tactical patience," ...and also claimed that there were many... "positive developments which give the Iraqi government and friends of Iraq real hope,"


The thing is, what takes away much hope is the fact that the U.S., meant to be leading (by example?), is setting the worst possible example for others to follow. With military attacks as the first option, tacit support for, and being responsible for, the slaughter of countless civilians. With soldiers and mercenaries on the ground that are, quite literally out of control. What kind of a world is the U.S. regime making for us these days?

As I'm sure many of you were aware, recently 5 U.S. soldiers, while on duty manning a checkpoint in Iraq, were able to slip away from their posts, change clothes, find alcohol, get drunk, then hunt down a 14 year old girl they had seen in the area. They proceeded to rape her, then to cover up their crime they murdered her entire family, her, and then burned her corpse to cover the evidence.

These actions are another in a string of unholy cases of U.S. soldiers or mercenaries (a.k.a. defence contractors) committing unspeakable acts in Iraq. The reason for this is a little known stipulation of Iraqi Law, signed by former U.S. "administrator" (self-appointed dictator doesn't sound as nice) Paul Bremer in 2004, called "Order 17," which grants full legal immunity to all U.S. personnel in Iraq. The U.S. was also able to negotiate into a U.N. mandate (the one that said it was O.K for the U.S. to stay in Iraq) international legal immunity for its soldiers and employees.
The current "President" of Iraq recently called on the UN to do away with that particular stipulation, saying "the immunity given to members of coalition forces encouraged them to commit crimes in cold blood."


What an example to set. Quite similarly, after a few years of being in office, Adolf Hitler signed a decree making the Gestapo above the law and immune from prosecution.


The Japan Times published an editorial today about American policies. It is entitled "Guantanamo: Shame On U.S."

Still, in the final analysis, the robustness and resilience of the U.S. commitment to human rights laws and norms will be judged not by the breaches in the aftermath of 9/11, but by their reversal and attenuation through domestic judicial and political processes. The unlawfulness of trials by military commissions for Guantanamo prisoners, and the applicability of the Geneva Conventions, were confirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in a landmark decision on June 29.

Guantanamo flouts not just due process, but also common decency and basic morality. The rise and diffusion of human rights norms and conventions and international humanitarian law were among the great achievements of the last century. Guantanamo represents a serious setback to this progressive development.

A human right, owed to every person simply as a human being, is inherently universal. Held only by human beings, but equally by all, it does not flow from any office, rank or relationship. The language of human rights embodies the intuition that the human species is one and every individual is entitled to equal moral consideration.

...the rest of the editorial...

10.7.06

Israel in Gaza


This album is powered by
BubbleShare
- Add to my blog

---------------------------------


This week, dozens of Palestinians have been killed in continuing Israeli raids in Gaza, Palestine. Pictured above are members of the Hajaj family who were killed in recent bombing of Palestine by the Israeli Defence Forces. According to Y-Net news, the family was in their home when it was struck by an Israeli shell. Those pictured above include the mother of the family and two of her children, including a six year old girl.

Ehud Olmert has asserted that there is no timetable for an end to what Euronews describes as Gaza being "under a state of seige." Olmert stated at a cabinet meeting in Jerusalem that "This is a war which cannot be bound by time." According to Deutsche Presse-Agentur, Olmert and Defence Minister Amir Peretz stated that "Israel's current offensive in the Gaza Strip has no time limit and and its objectives have not yet been achieved."

I shudder to think of what the objectives might be, realistically, that they are trying to achieve. The longer this continues, the more innocent civilians will lose their lives, and the cycle of violence will perpetuate itself. It seems that the Israeli leaders have gone so far off the deep end this time that their aim is to try and completely crush the will of the Palestinian people, and if that does not work, just wipe them out altogether. The death and destruction they are leaving in their wake are going to have a lasting impact on any chance of stability in the troubled region.

I am not alone in being outraged and heartbroken as to the mounting crisis in Palestine. On sunday 50,000 people took to the streets of Istanbul, Turkey, to protest Israel's invasion of palestine.

As I have observed on many occasions about many situations, Israels actions (supposedly to fight against "the terrorists") are only increasing their support base; one of the slogans most widely chanted at the demonstration in Turkey was "Farewell to Sharon, Devotion to Hamas."

"Gaza is now without electricity for 12 to 18 hours a day, food prices have increased by 10 percent in a week, and water supplies can only be maintained for another two weeks." Euronews reports. UN Secretary General Kofi Annan describes the situation as on "the brink" of a catastrophe.

“I call again for an immediate halt to the disproportionate use of force by Israel, which has already killed and wounded many civilians; for the release of Israeli Army Corporal Gilad Shalit; and for the cessation of rocket fire into Israel,” were the specific words used by Kofi Annan on the 7th. He reiterated his concerns on the 8th, in a statement reported on the UN News Center website.

“As I have repeatedly stated, I am extremely concerned about the dangerous situation in the occupied Palestinian Territory,” Mr. Annan said in a statement released in Berlin, Germany.
“I am appealing for urgent action to alleviate the desperate humanitarian situation of the civilian population.”

The Arab Maghrib Union added their voices to those expressing condemnation for the situation, saying "Israeli military aggression was an exercise of a state terrorism and a breach of international norms and signed agreements with the Palestinian people" as reported by the Kuwait News Agency.

The Israeli group Gosh Shalom "called upon the European Union and its member states, possibly in conjunction with other countries, to intervene immediately and effectively in the looming Israel-Palestinian crisis" on Sunday according to WAFA Palestinian News Agency. They also pleaded for EU peacekeeping troops to intervene in the desperate situation.

An air raid Sunday, that was an attempt at an assassination ("targeted killing") of a "militant" missed its intended target and wounded 5 civilians, including this young girl.


The situation in Palestine is already a humanitarian crisis that borders on genocide, and this latest incursion is only making the problem exponentially worse. It is counterproductive to the stated goal of Israel of putting an end to the militant attacks.

According to Al Bawaba news agency, "despite the Israeli attacks, rockets continued to land in Israel. In the latest attacks, a rocket landed in a street in the Israeli town of Sderot, wounding one person, the [Israeli] army said."

The continuing slaughter of civilians by the IDF and the destruction of Palestine is only going to increase support for those who would fight against Israel. The cycle of violence is spiraling out of control, with no end in sight. The situation has deteriorated to such an extent that for intervention to not occur now would be a travesty against any semblence of respect for human life. We need to call on our leaders to step in and put an end to this horrible situation.

Iraq Civil War

It never ceases to amaze me the excuses people can give themselves to justify (in their mind) cold blooded murder. To an increasing extent over the past year, Iraqi people have become divided along lines of fairly inconsequential religious sectarian differences. Based on my reading, there is honestly no more of a difference between Sunni and Shiite than there is between Protestant and Catholic, but there seems to be increasing numbers of Iraqis who would rather not see themselves as Arab, Muslim, Iraqi, or Human, but rather strictly as Sunni or Shia; and they have been indoctrinated enough to believe that to kill for such a meaningless reason is acceptable. How can people allow themselves to be led like that? I just don't understand.

This has been a bloody weekend in Iraq.
This was the news from AFP today:


BAGHDAD (AFP) - Bands of masked gunmen went on a rampage in a predominantly Sunni Baghdad neighborhood, killing at least 42 Sunni Arabs in a gruesome sectarian attack despite a massive security crackdown, witnesses said.

The apparent response to the attacks was swift, with at least 19 people killed and 59 wounded in two powerful car bombs next to a Shiite mosque in a mixed neighbourhood of the predominantly Sunni district of Adhamiyah on the capital's north side, an interior ministry official said.


German news agency Deutsche Welle ran the following in their english section:


Dozens Killed in Baghdad

Gunmen in the Iraqi capital Baghdad have killed at least 40 people at a fake checkpoint, in an apparent sectarian attack against Sunni Muslims. Police say Shia militants stopped cars in the western Jihad district, separated Sunnis and shot them. The area is close to a Shiite mosque where a car bomb killed three people late on Saturday. Security forces have sealed off the area and imposed a curfew, in an effort to prevent revenge attacks. In other violence two car bombs at a mosque in central Baghdad has killed at least 25 people and wounded 30. And an Iraqi army intelligence officer was shot dead in Karbala, south of Baghdad. There has been an upsurge in sectarian violence in Iraq in recent months, raising fears of a civil war.



A sectarian civil war in "Liberated" Iraq. How could this happen?
Iraqi Blogger-turned-author Riverbend made a few statements on the subject over the past 3 years.


Saturday March 18, 2006:"I read constantly analyses mostly written by foreigners or Iraqis who’ve been abroad for decades talking about how there was always a divide between Sunnis and Shia in Iraq (which, ironically, only becomes apparent when you're not actually living amongst Iraqis they claim)… but how under a dictator, nobody saw it or nobody wanted to see it. That is simply not true- if there was a divide, it was between the fanatics on both ends. The extreme Shia and extreme Sunnis. Most people simply didn’t go around making friends or socializing with neighbors based on their sect. People didn't care- you could ask that question, but everyone would look at you like you were silly and rude."

August 26, 2003: Let's Play Musical Chairs...
The nine-member rotating presidency is a failure at first sight. It’s also a failure at second, third, fourth… and ninth sight. The members of the rotating presidency, composed of 4 Shi’a Muslims, 2 Sunni Muslims and 2 Kurds, were selected on a basis of ethnicity and religion.

It is a way of further dividing the Iraqi population. It is adding confusion to chaos and disorder. Just the concept of an ethnically and religiously selected council to run the country is repulsive. Are people supposed to take sides according to their ethnicity or religion?


"Are people supposed to take sides according to their religion?" she asked. Well, it would seem that's what has happened, with disasterous consequences. For those of you who are religious, say a prayer for the poor souls in Iraq today.
-----------------


9.7.06

Torture Awareness and Richard Tomlinson vs. MI6

Many weeks ago, an inspired activist by the name of Elendil started putting together a group of bloggers to highlight Amnesty International's "Torture Awareness Month" in June. At the beginning I think there was about 10 of us who signed on, and by the end the blogroll was pages long (just have a look at my sidebar).

A blogger has decided to attempt to raise money for Amnesty International's campaign by blogging for 24 hours straight. You can support him by clicking the link below.






I recently received the following email regarding the campaign:
Hi everyone

Thank you so much for your recent support of Bloggers Against Torture.
Torture Awareness Month may be over, but action against torture
continues. One of our bloggers, Heathlander, has generously
volunteered to go 24 hours without sleep -- blogging continuously the
whole time -- to raise money for Amnesty International USA. It's all
part of Blogathon 2006 (http://www.blogathon.org/), which will be held
across the globe on 29th July.

Would you like to help us out? Here's some things that you can do:

- Join Heathlander and stay up with him for 24 hours of continuous blogging!

If you'd like to help Heathlander stay awake and write posts, leave
a message here.

We're eager to get a small team together to share the load. If you
join up, we'll send you keys to the central blog, and the opportunity
to use your blogging skills for a good cause.

- Sponsor us in the Blogathon

I know it's unseemly to ask for money, so I've put $500 down to get
things started. If you can spare it, even just a few dollars, it will
work towards fighting for this serious issue. Every bit counts, and
generous donor blogs will be acknowledged.

- Let your readers know about our Blogathon

Thanks to your Torture Awareness Month posts, your readers now know
how serious human rights abuse is and their responsibilities towards
it. The enormity of the issue can leave one despondent, but this gives
everyone an opportunity to do something practical. Again, every bit
counts. Your voice can make all the difference.

For Torture Awareness Month we had great turn out with over 200
members joining, and several members participating in the action
activities sponsored by the NGOs. Most pleasing was the high quality
of thoughtful and passionate blog entries denouncing torture. Whether
your blog is big or small, each voice counts towards correcting public
opinion and returning our society back to its true course. Please
consider continuing this work by supporting the Bloggers Against
Torture Blogathon.

Kind Regards,
elendil


For you bloggers out there, the blog Rummy's Diaries is full of useful information for the fight against torture.






---------------------------------------------------


There have been recent news reports regarding a blog by a former agent of MI6 (Britain's version of the CIA, whom the fictional James Bond was meant to work for) that was troubling to the British Government due to a fear of leaks of intelligence.

The Blog is:

Tomlinson vs. MI6


Recently he was said to have supplied an aerial photograph of an Mi6 training camp, he was accused of releasing a list of MI6 agents worldwide (to a website called Cryptome.org), he has had his belongings confiscated, his friend's computer confiscated, and so on.

Perhaps he might be able to provide some information about MI6 agents operating in Iraq and Iran...

8.7.06

Election Terrorism

Also in the news recently was the Massive Win in the War on Terror (/sarcasm) that basically involved people discussing in an internet chatroom how easy it would be to bomb the NY/NJ PATH Train and was embellished to make them into a Large and Fearsome Al Qaida Cell. A coincidence that this happened in the lead up to an important mid-term election where the GOP strategists have decided they need to stress "national security" to win? I doubt it.

Branedy has a brilliant post on the subject.
-------
Branedy's follow up comment to the post:

One could conclude that:
1) that they did not need this if that already knew that it was a known (chat) meeting point.
2) that there had only been talk about that ‘attack’, which believe it or not is not illegal.
3) that the coincidence of this is a bit too convenient just before an election cycle.
4) that if they caught one of the the terrorist and he just so happens to be involved with al-Qaeda

Too many bits of good news.


-------

North Korea Missile Tests

Over the past few days there has been a great deal of coverage of the recent tests by the DPRK (Democratic People's Republic of Korea, a.k.a. North Korea) of medium- and long-range ballistic missles. This coverage has varied substantially, from neglegable to outlandish. Fox News in America went so far as to claim (and I am not making this up) that they were "Nukes" that were "aimed at Hawaii." It goes without saying that such an assertion is fictional (not based whatsoever in reality), but it was made nonetheless. Its important to step back for a moment and get a more realistic take on the situation.

In a recent press conference, the U.S. President George Bush, when asked why he thought N. Korea would conduct such an exersise, stated (referring to the N. Korean Premier Pak Pong Ju) "I don't know what the man's intentions are."

For an individual who has access to a vast array of information sources, such as those available with basic internet access, "the man's" intentions should be fairly clear.

Firstly, a logical conclusion that could be drawn would be the fact that North Korea was re-affirming its deterrant to military attack. This is a byproduct of the U.S. government's famed one percent doctrine, wherein a soverign nation can be attacked if there is even a one percent chance that they might attack America, and that one percent chance does not have to be substantiated with any sort of evidence. As such, any country in the world can be attacked by America at any given time, provided that the U.S. propaganda machine can manufacture enough conscent in America for the invasion. Leaders of countries on America's hit list know this, and as such they must ensure that they have enough of a military deterrant to preclude any overt military action. Pyongyang was merely reminding the White House that they should not be the next target for attack (Iran is out of the running now for reasons I've discussed in great detail in many previous posts, and Iraq and Afghanistan have already happened... there's more than 2 years left of this presidency, the "war president" turned "decider" needs another war soon or he won't know how to handle himself, or maybe he needs to send more working class people off to die so that there won't be so many of them around to vote against his successor in the next presidential election).

Another reason for North Korea launching these ballistic missiles (to test them, not to take out Waikiki) has been touched on to a certain extent in the western media. The Los Angeles Times ran a story recently referring to the tests as a "Big, Booming Cry for Attention." While The Times' patronising tone does not go unnoticed, such a statement is in fact based somewhat in the realities of the situation. In November of last year, 6 party talks (between N. Korea, S. Korea, The U.S., China, Russia, and Japan) regarding the DPRK (N. Korea) Nuclear program were suspended indefinitely. This was due to DPRK's withdrawl from the talks based on what they felt was a lack of respect for them and for previous agreements reached between them and Japan and the U.S., which Japan and the U.S. have not lived up to their obligations for. For a better understanding of this, we now turn to the State-Run News Agency (Xinhua) of North Korea's close ally (and feared rival of America), China:



PYONGYANG, July 6 (Xinhua) -- A spokesman for the DPRK Foreign Ministry confirmed Thursday that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) had test-fired missiles, saying the missile launches were part of the routine military exercises aimed at increasing the nation's military capacity for self-defense.

The spokesman said in a statement that the DPRK remains unchanged in its will to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula in a negotiated peaceful manner just as it committed itself in the Sept. 19 joint statement of the six-party talks, the official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) reported.

The latest missile launch exercises are quite irrelevant to the six-party talks, the statement said.

The KCNA also quoted the spokesman as saying that the missile launches were "successful" and that "the DPRK's exercise of its legitimate right as a sovereign state is neither bound to any international law nor to bilateral or multilateral agreements such as DPRK-Japan Pyongyang Declaration and the joint statement of the six-party talks."

"The missile test moratorium reached between the DPRK and the United States in 1999 was valid only when the DPRK-U.S. dialogue was under way," it said.

The Bush administration, however, has scrapped all the agreements its preceding governments reached with the DPRK and "totally scuttled" the bilateral dialogue, said the statement.

It noted it was the same case with the DPRK-Japan Pyongyang Declaration in 2002 on the long-range missile test-fire.

In the Declaration, the DPRK expressed its "intention to extend beyond 2003 the moratorium on the missile fire," a step taken on the premise that Japan moved to "normalize its relations with the DPRK and redeem its past, the statement said.

However, the Japanese authorities didn't honor their commitment. Moreover, they have pursued a hostile policy toward the DPRK together with the U.S. and chosen to internationalize the "abduction issue" although the DPRK had fully settled the issue.

"It is a manifestation of the DPRK's broad magnanimity that it has put on hold the missile launch so far under this situation," the statement added.


The statement by Pyongyang that immediately followed these missile tests basically included an offer to not launch any more missles (which seemed to scare the world a bit, kind of like swatting at a hornets nest with a rake where the hornets nest is America) if negotiations were resumed (note this quote:
"The missile test moratorium reached between the DPRK and the United States in 1999 was valid only when the DPRK-U.S. dialogue was under way," it said.

The Bush administration, however, has scrapped all the agreements its preceding governments reached with the DPRK and "totally scuttled" the bilateral dialogue, said the statement.
).


The launches should come as no surprise however. On the 28th of June, China came out warning Korea against swatting at the hornets nest (test firing missiles), as they were already aware (as were many members of the non-western media) of N. Korean development of long range ballistic missles. China was, however, worried about the situation:
"We hope that the various parties will proceed from the greater interest of maintaining stability on the Korean Peninsula and refrain from taking measures that will worsen the situation," Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao said in a statement at the time.
However, as a tripolar order begins to take shape wherein countries like Russia and China are realising that they don't actually have to take orders from Washington, the U.S. needs to heed the advise of Hu Jintao when he said that America needs to allow the U.N. to take the lead in international issues. After all, it just won't do to have the country that many people in the world feel is the greatest threat to world peace running the international arena.


Again, as with Iran, China and Russia do not support sanctions as the best course of action. The Russian ambassador to the U.N. phrased their view in such a way as to say "in my mind we could consider the format of a presidential statement." (condemning the tests). While Japan has already drafted a security council resolution calling for sanctions, China has refused to support the imposition of sanctions against their close ally, and Pyongyang has stated(according to Reuters) that "If sanctions are invoked, we will take strong and full counter measures."

North Korea has already made apparent its willingness to return to the negotiating table to discuss their ballistic missiles, trade, aid, and their Nuclear program. Level headed people (who do not want a return to the days of peace-by-mutual-assured-destruction) need to encourage the use of diplomatic forums rather than military action as a first resort that has become the formost policy of America and Britain. Tangling with North Korea (and with them China and their allies) is not a smart game for the west to play. Just to remind those of you what it is that the international community is aware of as far as North Korea's Nuclear program is concerned, the most recent IAEA report on the subject:

"Implementation of Safeguards in the Democratic People´s Republic of Korea
Since the end of 2002, when at the request of the Democratic People´s Republic of Korea (DPRK) the Agency´s verification activities were terminated, the Agency has been unable to verify the DPRK´s nuclear activities.
As I have reported before, the Agency stands ready to work with the DPRK - and other concerned parties - towards a comprehensive solution that addresses the security and other needs of the DPRK, on the one hand, and on the other hand, the needs of the international community to ensure that all nuclear activities in the DPRK are exclusively for peaceful purposes."

American foreign policy authors need to understand the gravity of their constant militaristic tendencies. Constant threat - of and resort - to violence is only encouraging other nations to militarise, with potentially disasterous consequences. That constant threat and use of violence (that embodies American Foreign Policy) is also the very definition of Terrorism.




It should also be noted that the DPRK has legitamate grievances with the U.S. It was the American-Korean war that created the artificial partition through Korea. As recently as yesterday the DPRK government was calling on its citizens to embark upon a "Patriotic Struggle for National Reunification." If you're curious, a different side of the Korea-America historical story is available at the Official Homepage of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. Its interesting to get a different take on certain situations.

6.7.06

Freedom and Independence on the Fourth of July

Last year, on the American Independence Day, I flew into JFK Airport in New York from abroad. I was greeted by countless NYPD officers carrying M16 automatic rifles due to a heightened state of security created out of fear of a terrorist attack to coincide with America's celebration of Independence. On subsequent travels, I have noticed that foreign embassies tend to be friendly, inviting places for citizens in foreign countries to come for travel assistance; that is, except American Embassies. American Embassies are generally fortified like a military compound, out of fear of a "terrorist" attack. Flying into America, American citizens and non-citizens alike are forced to pass through more security checkpoints than for nearly any other destination on the planet, save perhaps Iraq. At some point don't people wonder: What are we doing so wrong that we have to live in fear all over the world, even in our own country?

Earlier this year, a company called Mercer Human Resource Consulting released its findings on the world's best and worst cities to live in. Its findings would have been troubling to Americans had the media bothered to mention it, but to do so may have been to wake the American Public from their reverrie of ignorance, so of course this didn't happen. Of the top 30 cities, nearly half were in Western Europe, quite a few from Asia, and just 2 from America. Those 2 were Honolulu (27th) and San Francisco (28th). Given this knowledge, might Americans question the fact that they have spent $293,000,000,000
and counting on the war in Iraq, while their quality of living is not up to par with their European and Asian counterparts?

American policies in the Middle East (read: Iraq as a Petri Dish for testing the National Security Strategy of 2002) are doing more to increase the threat of terrorism than to protect the safety and well being of its citizens. Is that not a violation of the very foundations of America? Lets have a look at the Declaration of Independence:


"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."

It is impossible, at this moment, to conclude that the Safety and Happiness of the people of America are being adequately secured by their "democratically" elected government. While Americans seem to believe, through their fog of ignorance, that somehow the Iraq War has helped increase their safety, the sad truth that the rest of the world is aware of is that it has not. Just look at the following recent poll results:


What I wonder is wether or not Americans genuinely believe that they must accept and agree with everything their government is doing to be nationalistic. Does the love of ones country have to blind them to the follies of their leaders?

Another disturbing trend Americans should note this Independence week is the fact that the "liberty" and "freedom" that their government exists to protect, that their 450,000,000,000 per year "Defence" budget exists to protect, is being infringed by a mixture of draconian encroachments on civil liberty (under the guise of National Security") and startling overextention of executive powers that is turning America into a Police State right under the noses of its population.

Simultaneously, disturbing trends of global warming, which are going to have a disasterous effect on the amount of food and inhabitable space that will be around for our grandchildren, is being wholeheartedly ignored by those in power.

Is this the world that the creators of America envisioned when they declared its Independence from Imperial Britain?

29.6.06

Respect

Bishop Desmond Tutu once said "a person is a person because he recognises others as persons." The implication of that recognition is an integral part of my definition for what I believe is an important concept: Respect.

For an individual to be treated with respect, they must exhibit respect. There are concepts I believe that a morally guided person must have respect for. The very idea that we are capable of contemplating such concepts is unique to the human species, as we are the only ones capable of rational thought; that is what differentiates us from every other species of organism on this planet. Without the higher level of thought that is the basis for the particularly human system of intellectual organisation, we are no better than or different from slugs or bacteria.

Today, as in many other dark times in human history, there are individuals who for one reason or another have lost sight of the important notion of respect. For the greater good of our species, we must all maintain a level of respect for our fellow man, for the fragile ecosystem that sustains all life on this planet, for the sanctity of human life, for Morality, for the equality of all persons, for the freedom to pursue individual thought, for reason, for true freedom, for human rights, for love, and for knowledge.

An american race car driver by the name of Richard Petty once said "if guys don't respect themselves, they don't respect other people." Perhaps powerful people in our world today have no respect for themselves. Perhaps that's how they are able to justify taking away the freedom and the dignity of their fellow human beings, taking their lives, and doing so without any respect for basic humanity.

Aristotle once said "At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst." There is no justice for those who have been tortured in Nazi-style prison camps. There is no law controlling the actions of perverted individuals operating illegally in an occupied country. This can only bring out the worst in people, at both the giving and receiving end of these policies.

Certain powerful individuals in the world today exhibit a total lack of respect for knowledge. The current prevailing mentality of certain regimes to move towards a military attack as the first option for a course of action is to ignore the lessons history has taught us as to the consequences of such a doctrine. Empires have crumbled under the weight of their own military ambitions. Such a contempt for knowledge, and for learning history's lessons, is contrary to the teachings of one of the most influential writings on military strategy, The Art of War by Sun Tzu. One of the main points of this writing is that knowledge is the most essential element for victory. The attack as a first response doctrine is also contrary to the teachings of the oldest recorded philosophical teachings, the Tao Te Ching. The Tao's book of Leadership and Strategy tells a story of a master thief who was caught stealing from the army of an ancient chinese king. The leader of that army, knowledgeable in the art of successful conflict resolution, decided that he would put the thief to use rather than put him to death for his crime. The theif was sent to the enemy camp where he stole the pillow from the bed of the sleeping enemy leader. The next day that pillow was returned with apologies. The enemy leader, fearing that if it were so easy for the pillow to be stolen from under his head as he slept it must be also possible for him to be killed in the same fashion, offered a truce and withdrew. The end result was the most preferable one: victory without any bloodshed.

This concept is an important one to note. I have mentioned previously my views on the fact that violence only brings more violence, as evidenced by the continuing "resistance" in Iraq, the ongoing bloody conflict between Palestine and Israel, murderous attacks by and against the Marxist rebels in Columbia, and so on. If a doctrine or mentality or virtuous intent is genuinely so strong, there is no need for continuing violence as to do so only sparks more angry resistance. If the virtuous intent of America is to be believed, they must stop their constant resort to violence, as it is the least desirable method towards an attempt at conflict resolution.

For some time now many powers have shown a contemptuous lack of respect for the fragile ecosystem that supports life on this planet. Our species must learn to enact the concepts of respect not only towards each other but towards our environment. Without the environment, there will be no human species for it to support. While the trend of Global Warming is well documented in recent years, startling knowledge has come to light recently that leads many experts to believe that the process of global warming due to greenhouse gas emissions is to increase exponentially in speed. This is due to the fact that ice shelfs that have covered a peat bog the size of France and Germany combined (peat produces Methane gas, a potent greenhouse gas) are melting rapidly so as to expose the Greenhouse gas producing substance. This will accellerate the warming process, which has in recent years as a result of industrial pollution. Not only is there a high probablity that such accelerated warming will leave large parts of this planet uninhabitable, but there is also research that suggests that it could lead to . It is important to note that the end of the last ice age came abruptly, with the world temperature shifting from ice to temperate in only 20 years. Such a climate shift today would likely wipe out a large percentage of the worlds population, in addition to much animal and plant life. The continuing lack of respect for the environment in which we live will eventually, if it continues as it is going now, lead to there being no environment left for us to respect, and in turn we won't be around to try to fix the issue. Voluntary reduction of the level of increase of emissions from the worlds most dangerous pollutor are not enough. If changes are not made soon, and those in power realise that respecting the environment is vital to our survival, the consequences could be .

Treat a person like an animal and they will behave like an animal. Treat a person with dignity and they will act with respect. To torture and detain our fellow man, to murder, to destroy: such actions by the worlds most powerful can only bring out the worst in people. I believe that we, as a people, have the capability to be so much better, and when leading with such an example others can be sure to follow. By leading with the example of kill first ask questions later (question 1: where are those WMDs?), we only encourage others to do the same. If we treat our environment with no respect, the environment will be incapable of showing us respect (allowing our continued existance). Changes must be made soon, because by all accounts later might be too late.




I shall leave you today with the inspired words of a U.S. Senator/ Basketball star by the name of Bill Bradley:

"Respect your fellow human being, treat them fairly, disagree with them honestly, enjoy their friendship, explore your thoughts about one another candidly, work together for a common goal and help one another achieve it. No destructive lies. No ridiculous fears. No debilitating anger."

In the News today:

US top court rejects Guantanamo military tribunals

WASHINGTON - In a major blow for President George W. Bush’s war on terrorism, the US Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the military tribunal system set up to try Guantanamo prisoners violates the Geneva Conventions and US military rules.


“We conclude that the military commission convened to try (Salim Ahmed) Hamdan lacks power to proceed because its structure and procedures violate” the international agreement that covers treatment of prisoners of war, as well as US military rules, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the court majority in the 5-3 decision


From
The Khaleej Times.

So, now we must just wait for the Indictments to start coming down for actively pursuing unlawful policies... that's a law, you know. (It's called "command responsibility") But then again, how often do those in charge actually have to take responsibility?
-----------------------------------------

In other news, the U.S. Propaganda Push is failing miserably in Europe and most of the rest of the world. I guess the IIP isn't doing its job.

From the Blog Understanding Europe: Support for the USA has totally collapsed.



-------
The Blog Story

The PEW Global Poll results that were the basis for the blog report.

21.6.06

Views on Terrorism

This is merely a re-post of an article I wrote weeks ago, but I think it's important to reiterate my view on the subject.


It has been recently brought to my attention (by people who actually concentrate on my comments or posts rather than my profile) that some of my statements come across as sympathetic to what is colloquially defined as "terror."
I am not, nor ever have been, supportive of terror, terrorism, or any other related actions; I feel that they fly in the face of basic morality.
As far as the question of "do the ends justify the means" (as in, if a positive goal is achieved does that justify the negative way it was brought about), I believe that they most certainly do not.
Call me a dreamer, but I believe that human beings have within their nature the capability to accomplish their goals without sacrificing basic human morality.
Regarding morality, I agree with conclusions reached by Plato and Aristotle that not only is morality the most effective means to achieve one's objectives, it is also it's own reward.

That having been said, there is an important aspect of this dialogue that is not being covered. It is important to contemplate the difference (?) between a "freedom fighter" and a "terrorist," especially as it relates to one's self image.

If I may, I would like to leave you with a question. Or a few, perhaps. Of the following, whom would you consider to be a "freedom fighter" and whom a "terrorist." Or are they neither? Or both? (What exactly constitutes "terrorism" these days anyway?) Furthermore, does their view of themself hold true to your characterisation, and does the historical record agree with your point of view, or theirs? Does that historical record change with the times? So what are they, really, then?

Nelson Mandela? Gerry Adams? Osama Bin Ladin? Yassir Arafat? Shimon Peres? Emmanuel Constant? Bobby Sands? James Connolly? George Washington? Robert E. Lee? William Wallace? Che Guevera? Fidel Castro? Ronald Reagan? George Bush? Abu Abbas? George Shultz? Leon Klinghoffer? Kemal Zugheyer? Bill Clinton? Margaret Thatcher? Bobby Seale? Ali Akbar Mohtashemi? Wolfe Tone? Txabi Etxebarrieta?

And, perhaps most importantly, why?

19.6.06

American Defensiveness: without an opposing argument.

This is the kind of response you get from neo-con-supporting Americans when you assert that American policies are engendering the kind of anger and resentment that leads to people turning to "extremism" as an avenue for the release of their anger.

(By the way, I made these assertions because I feel betrayed by the American government, and I feel that all people of the world who value human life, and were heartbroken by the events of 9/11, have been betrayed by them as well.)

The response (the one I liked the most):

Misneach:

If you will kindly provide your GPS coordinates, the United States government will be happy to respond to your concerns. Trust us, you will have no worries after we do so.Thank you for your attention to this matter, and do not hesitate to contact us again if you have any further questions. (Just post to this blog. We have your IP address and will take it from there.)

CIA Email Homepage 06.17.06 - 10:58 am #






People are funny.